Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Nationalized Vs Universal Health Care

Nationalized and universal health care are often misused terms.


Health care reform debates in politics have both obscured and illuminated the difference between nationalized and universal health care. Advocates on both sides of the debate bandy about--and often misuse--terms such as "nationalized" health care and "universal" health care.


Misconceptions


Some debates on health care reform treat nationalized and universal health care as synonymous. Briefly stated, nationalized care is universal but not all universal health care is nationalized.


Identification


Under nationalized health care, sometimes called "socialized medicine," the government owns hospitals and employs doctors and other providers. Universal health care means all people have access to health insurance and medical care.


Famous Ties


Examples of nationalized health care include Britain's National Health Service, as well as the U.S. health care system for military veterans provided by the Veterans Administration.


Geography


Universal health care refers to everyone having access to affordable care, not to the actual delivery of care. Canada's universal health care system, for example, covers all Canadians.


Significance


Although universal health care, in theory at least, does not require government involvement, nearly all countries that provide universal care do so through a publicly funded program.


Features


The Canadian system provides universal coverage but physicians in Canada are not government employees. Rather, they operate private practices and bill the government for services provided. The government funds health insurance coverage through taxes.







Tags: health care, health care, nationalized health, nationalized health care, universal health, universal health, universal health care